In their own words

Posted on
I think most members of the Church don’t know what LDS scholars are actually teaching.

We’re about to rectify that.
Starting today, my youtube channel features two series. One is titled “In Their Own Words” that shows you exactly what is being taught. The other is “How to find Mesomania in…” that shows you how to assess the various scholarly sources on the Internet.
It’s an eye-opener, for sure.
___________________
Thanks to Mesomania, nearly every member of the Church has had Meosamerica imprinted on his/her mind from childhood. The Arnold Friberg paintings are a big part of this, but the Mesoamerican theory has been taught from Primary through Institute. It’s what is still being taught at BYU campuses, albeit not as overtly as in the past. Mesomania has even been featured in the Ensign.
This is not the fault of the thousands of faithful, diligent teachers in the Church. For starters, none of them have been taught about what Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery actually wrote about the Hill Cumorah in Letter VII.
Go to lds.org and google “Letter VII” and you’ll see what I mean.
[You’ll get one result from the August 1990 Ensign in connection with Oliver Cowdery’s discussion of Moroni’s visit. You have to go to the bottom of the article and click on “Show references” to see it. It’s in footnote 4, and it’s a reference to the Messenger and Advocate. Unless you know how to do Church history research (and I show you how on youtube, here), you’ll never find the original. But you can search for “Letter VII” in the Joseph Smith papers and read it directly from Joseph’s own history!]
___________________
For whatever reason, LDS scholars and CES staff have successfully conveyed a false impression that the Church endorses a Mesoamerican setting, to the point that when faithful members of the Church want to discuss a North American setting, they are silenced, shunned, and ridiculed.
This behavior is unacceptable.
I’m going to provide some “ammunition” for those who are being treated this way.
If Mesoamerican advocates want to promote their ideas, fine. But they need to be up front in what they’re really teaching, and they need to stop treating alternative perspectives–especially the statements of Oliver Cowdery and Joseph Smith–as if they are apostate.
In fact, I favor more exposure of the Mesoamerican position. I’d like everyone in the Church to compare the North American setting to the Mesoamerican setting. That’s why I put a comparison table in my book, Mesomania. And on my consensus blog, here.
I think most members of the Church will be shocked to discover what has been going on for the last few decades in the academic realm of Book of Mormon geography.
It’s not just that so many LDS scholars and CES staff have explicitly rejected Joseph Fielding Smith’s views on this issue. I’m all in favor of academic freedom; people can believe and teach whatever they want.
But anyone who teaches in the Church has a very serious responsibility. Anyone who teaches the Book of Mormon and doesn’t at least inform students about Letter VII, IMO, is doing the students a disservice.
Aside from the suppression of that important Church history, it is where the two-Cumorahs theories are leading the teachers–and their students–that is the more serious problem.
___________________
 In addition to many websites, here are some of the books and articles we’re going to go through.

___________________

Source: Book of Mormon Wars

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *